Current:Home > MarketsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Secure Growth Academy
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-15 07:47:40
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (393)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Nex Benedict mourned by hundreds in Oklahoma City vigil: 'We need change'
- Alexey Navalny's body has been handed over to his mother, aide says
- A housing shortage is testing Oregon’s pioneering land use law. Lawmakers are poised to tweak it
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Odysseus moon lander tipped over onto its side during touchdown, company says
- Lunar New Year parade held in Manhattan’s Chinatown
- Biggest moments from the SAG Awards, from Pedro Pascal's f-bomb to Billie Eilish's Sharpie
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Vigils held nationwide for nonbinary Oklahoma teenager who died following school bathroom fight
Ranking
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- MLB free agent rumors drag into spring but no need to panic | Nightengale's Notebook
- Cody Bellinger re-signs with Chicago Cubs on three-year, $80 million deal
- What killed Flaco the owl? New York zoologists testing for toxins, disease as contributing factors
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Lunar New Year parade held in Manhattan’s Chinatown
- Biggest moments from the SAG Awards, from Pedro Pascal's f-bomb to Billie Eilish's Sharpie
- Josh Hartnett Makes Rare Appearance at 2024 SAG Awards After Stepping Away From Hollywood
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Chemours and DuPont Knew About Risks But Kept Making Toxic PFAS Chemicals, UN Human Rights Advisors Conclude
Soldier surprises younger brother at school after 3 years overseas
What's the best place to see the April 2024 solar eclipse? One state is the easy answer.
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Biden and Utah’s governor call for less bitterness and more bipartisanship in the nation’s politics
Olivia Rodrigo setlist: All the songs on 'Guts' tour including 'Vampire' and 'Good 4 U'
Jen Pawol becomes the first woman to umpire a spring training game since 2007